A Comparative Pilot Study
Josip Škaričić, Samir Čimić, [...], and Nikša Dulčić
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this pilot study was to examine the impact of occlusal splint treatment on mandibular border movements and the condyle position in subjects with bruxism.
Materials and methods
The study included 9 subjects diagnosed with bruxism (mean age 28.7) and 9 subjects in the control group (mean age 30.5). All subjects were adults, eugnathic, and with a dentoalveolar Angle Class I, without prosthetic restorations, previous or current orthodontic treatments, a systemic disease or previous surgical interventions in the temporomandibular joint. All experimental and control group subjects were provided with a standardized relaxation occlusal splint, which they wore for 8 weeks. During this time, an initial and three additional measurements of incisal opening (IO), left condyle opening (OLC), right condyle opening (ORC), left laterotrusion (LLI) and right laterotrusion (LRI) (after 2, 4 and 8 weeks) were performed using an Arcus Digamma II (Kavo) ultrasound device for mandibular movements recording. Using the same instrument, the condylar position during protrusion, left and right laterotrusion, and in the centric relation position (CR) was analyzed initially and after 8 weeks using the maximum intercuspation as reference point. Continuous variables were described using basic statistical parameters, and the statistical significance of differences between the variables was checked by the t-test and χ2 test (p <0.05).
Results
The values of IO, OLC, ORC, LLI and LRI increased after 8 weeks of wearing, with the highest increase for OLC, by 13.8%. No statistically significant difference (p <0.05) was found for any changes in movements. Changes in the condyle position during all movements and those in the CR were higher in the experimental group for 10 out of 14 measured parameters compared to the control group. A statistically significant difference was established for 5 out of 14 measured parameters after the occlusal splint treatment.
Conclusions
The results of this pilot study have proven the influence of the occlusal splint treatment on mandibular border movements in subjects with bruxism by increasing the range of movements. Also the changes of the condyle position in subjects with bruxism were greater compared to those in healthy subjects.
Key words: Bruxism, Occlusal Splints, Mandibular Condyle
Introduction
Bruxism is a repetitive rhythmic activity of masticatory muscles characterized by teeth clenching or grinding and/or mandibular suppression (1). Although bruxism is not considered to be a disorder but a behavior that is both a risk and a protective factor, it still engages researchers and clinicians intensely (2). Clinical consequences of bruxism include tooth wear, temporomandibular disorders, headache and masticatory pain, especially after waking up, while bruxism as a protective factor occurs in obstructive sleep apnea, with all its consequences (2, 3). Because of its unclear etiology, the treatment of bruxism is complex, and it includes intraoral devices, pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, and behavioral therapy (4). Although there is no consensus on its exact clinical indications and effect, the occlusal splint fabrication is the most common kind of treatment for patients with bruxism (5). It protects from teeth damage during strong muscular jaw contractions, thus reducing orofacial pain at the same time (6). By knowing and considering other effects of occlusal splints, such as the placebo effect, changes in occlusal contacts, improvement of masticatory muscle function, changes in patient behavior, and new positioning of the condyle and/or joint disc, the mechanisms of their effect have not been fully investigated yet (7). Masticatory function research relies on the use of advanced technology and state-of-the-art devices. Arcus Digma II (ADII) is one of the devices the scientific and practical value of which, as well as the repeatability of measurements, have been validated through research (8-10). ADII is an ultrasonic electronic device, a kinematic face bow with six degrees of freedom, which records condyle movement and position, as well as mandibular movements. Research into the effect of occlusal splint treatment in subjects with bruxism has shown its impact on changes in masticatory muscle activity, the incidence of bruxism, and quality of life. The results of research have shown a change in the range of mandibular movements in subjects with bruxism, however, no studies have been conducted so far regarding the changes in the value of mandibular movements in subjects with bruxism during and after the occlusal splint treatment (11-13). The condyle position in the temporomandibular joint has often been investigated, but as shown by Obrez and Gallo (13), only through the development of modern kinematic three-dimensional systems with six degrees of freedom it is possible to measure the condyle position and movement mathematically accurately. So far, the research in which such devices were used has confirmed that occlusal splint impacts the condyle position in a way that vertical displacement of the condyle between maximum intercuspation (MI) and centric relation (CR) is increased, while the horizontal and transversal condylar displacement show considerable variability (11, 12). The objective of this pilot study was to examine the impact of the occlusal splint treatment on mandibular border movements and the condyle position in subjects with bruxism. The study hypothesis was that there would be no difference both in limited mandibular movements and in the condyle position before and after the occlusal splint treatment in subjects with bruxism.
Materials and methods
This pilot study included 9 subjects diagnosed with bruxism (mean age 28.7) and 9 control group subjects (mean age 30.5). The subjects were adults, eugnathic, and with a dentoalveolar Angle Class I. The subjects with prosthetic restorations, previous or current orthodontic treatment, as well as with previous surgical interventions in the temporomandibular joint area and with a systemic disease, were excluded from the study. The study was conducted in Split recruiting the subjects from the entire southern Croatia. After clinical examination, the subjects with symptoms and signs of bruxism or temporomandibular disorders (TMD) completed the "Bruxism Diagnostic Questionnaire" and the "Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Criterion" (DC/TMD) - Axis I (14-16). "Bruxism Diagnostic Questionnaire" (14, 15) consisted of 6 yes/no questions, and if the subject answered two questions positively, the bruxism was diagnosed. DC/TMD –Axis I Questionnaire was used to find end exclude the subjects with TMD. The subjects diagnosed with bruxism based on their medical history, clinical examination, and questionnaire results were classified into the experimental group, while the subjects with TMD were excluded from the study. The subjects without symptoms and signs of bruxism and TMD were classified into the control group. Each subject signed the informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb. The examiner standardization and repeatability of measurements were ensured in a way that all the measurements were made by the same examiner, who had received training and calibration instructions for the ADII ultrasound device. Five initial measurements were carried out on the first two subjects each. For the mandibular border movement analysis, the coefficient of variation amounted to a maximum of 0.9%, while for the condylar position analysis the maximum value was 5%. The study was conducted in a way that an occlusal splint was made for each subject of the experimental and control group using a standardized procedure, based on the values obtained with the three-dimensional kinematic face bow (ADII). After taking alginate impressions of the upper and lower jaws (Aroma Fine Plus, GC, Japan), stone casts were made and a paraocclusion tray (Unitray, Polident, Slovenia) used later for all measurements was made on the lower cast. The upper jaw position was registered using the occlusal tray with upper teeth silicone impressions (Optosil, Heraeus, Germany), after which the paraocclusion tray was attached to the lower dental arch using a temporary restorative material (Structur 2 SC, Voco, Germany), and the initial measurement was started. The subjects were positioned in the way that the Frankfurt horizontal plane was parallel to the floor, making a 90º angle with the back of a chair. Using the KTS ("Kavo Transfer System") module on the ADII device, each subject performed three protrusion movements and the right and left laterotrusions, guided by occlusal contacts. According to the movements performed, the program calculated and displayed values for each subject for left and right condylar path inclination (SCI), left and right Bennett angle (BK), left and right immediate lateral displacement (ISS), incisal guidance angle (KIV) and left and right lateral anterior guidance angle (KLV). Centric relation (CR) registration was taken using an acrylic carrier with a deprogrammer (jig), lateral registration made of composite thermoplastic material (Bite Compound, GC, Japan), and by using a chin point guidance technique. Stone casts were articulated into a fully adjustable articulator (Protar Evo 7, Kavo, Biberach, Germany) using a transfer table ("Arcus Digma bite fork holder") and the CR registration. The articulator was individualized according to the previously obtained parameters (SCI, BK, ISS, KIV and KLV). Occlusal splints were made on the upper cast by a standardized procedure of cold polymerized acrylate application (Resil-S, Erkodent, and Pfalzgraffenweiler, Germany) onto a vacuum-drawn film. Occlusal contacts of the occlusal splint and the antagonist teeth were established according to the rule of mutually protected occlusion in static occlusion and according to the rule of canine-guided occlusion in dynamic occlusion. The splints were handed over to the subjects who were instructed to wear them at least 10 hours a day for 8 weeks. The following measurements were performed at the beginning of the treatment as the splints were handed over: (0 week) and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of wearing (1st, 2nd and 3rd control). Limited mandibular movements were measured in the Motion Analysis (MA) module of the ADII device. After detailed explanation and training, the subjects performed maximum mouth opening and closing, maximum left and right laterotrusion (occlusion-guided movements), and Posselt's border movements in the frontal and sagittal plane. After the movements were performed, the software calculated the values (in millimeters) for sagittal incisal point movements during all movements, as well as the values of condyle movements during mouth opening/closing. The condyle position was measured in the "EPA-Electronic Position Analysis of the Mandibular Position" (EPA) module of the ADII device. The device was used for the subjects’ bite registration at maximum intercuspation (IKP), registered as a reference point. Subsequently, the subjects performed the maximum protrusion and both laterotrusions. At the end of all movements, the subjects inserted the splint into the mouth and bit into it, making registration of the centric relation position. The software calculated the condyle position with respect to the reference position (in millimeters) in three spatial axes: x-axis - anteroposteriorly, y-axis - superoinferiorly, and z-axis - mediolaterally. These values were transferred to another program (Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA) using Microsoft Copy Points option for further processing. The procedure was performed at the beginning of treatment (0 weeks) and after 8 weeks (3rd control). For statistical analysis, STATISTICA 12.0 software package was used. The frequencies and percentages were calculated for each categorical variable. Continuous variables were described using basic statistical parameters (mean value, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and standard error of mean, median, minimum and maximum value). Normality of the data was checked by the Shapiro-Wilks W test and Homogeneity of variance by the Levene test. In case of deviation from normality, the results were mathematically normalized. The difference between two groups of continuous, normally distributed variables was checked by the t-test and for more than two groups by the one way analysis of variance, followed by the Newman-Keuls test in case that the analysis of variance showed a significant difference. The difference between percentages was checked by the χ2 test. In all calculations the significance level was set to p<0.05.
Results
The basic statistical parameters for incisal opening (IO), opening of left condyle (OLC), opening of right condyle (ORC), left laterotrusion (LLI) and right laterotrusion (LRI) measured at baseline (0) and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment are presented in Figure 1. In case of incisal opening, only a slight increase was observed after two weeks of the treatment (0.3%), while the increase after four and eight weeks amounted to 3.4% and 5.8%, respectively (Table 1). Among five measured parameters, opening of left condyle showed the highest percentage of increase following eight weeks of the treatment compared to the baseline (13.8%). Other parameters showed a somewhat lower increase after eight weeks compared to the initial value: opening of right condyle total increase of 8.9%, left laterotrusion, 7.5% and the right laterotrusion total increase of 5.7%. Although all five measured parameters showed an increase following eight weeks of the treatment, the analysis of variance showed no significant difference with respect to treatment duration. The basic statistical parameters for the position of the condyle in protrusion in the experimental and control group at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment are presented in Table 2. In the case of protrusion, X position increased both in the experimental and the control group after eight weeks of treatment. Considering Y and Z positions in protrusion, there were no changes in the experimental group following the treatment, while a slight decrease was observed for both Y and Z positions in the control group. In the case of right laterotrusion (Table 3), X position increased both in the experimental and control group after eight weeks of treatment. However, this increase is higher in the experimental group. Considering Y position, the experimental group showed a slight increase at the end of the treatment, while the control group showed almost no changes. For Z movement, both groups showed almost no changes compared to the baseline. X and Y position of the condyle in left laterotrusion (Table 4) increased both in the experimental and control group after eight weeks of treatment. Z movement increased from -0.02 mm to 0.11 mm in the experimental group, while there were no changes in the control group. X position of the condyle in centric relation decreased from 0.33 mm to 0.26 mm following eight weeks of treatment. In the same period, the control group showed a slight increase from 0.21 mm to 0.23 mm (Table 5). After eight weeks Y position increased in the experimental group, and remained unchanged in the control group, while Z position decreased in the experimental group, while almost no changes were observed in the control group. Table 6 presents the relative percentage of changes in the condyle position in protrusion, right and left laterotrusion and central relation in the experimental and control group after eight weeks compared to the baseline and the results of χ2 test. The only significant changes between those two groups in protrusion were observed for Z movement (p=0.0082). In right laterotrusion, a significant difference between the two groups was found for Y movement (p<0.0001). A significant difference in left laterotrusion was observed for Z movement (p<0.0001) and in central relation for both Y (p<0.0001) and Z movement (p=0.0005).
Figure 1
Mean value and standard deviation of incisal opening (IO), opening of left condyle (OLC), opening of right condyle (ORC), left laterotrusion (LLI) and right laterotrusion (LRI) measured at baseline and after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.
Table 1
Percentage of increase (decrease) of incisal opening (IO), opening of left condyle (OLC), opening of right condyle (ORC), left laterotrusion (LLI) and right laterotrusion (LRI) after different time periods compared to baseline.
Table 2
Basic statistical parameters for the position of the condyle in protrusion in the experimental (E) and control (C) group at baseline (0) and after eight weeks (8) of the treatment. X-mean value; SD-standard deviation, CV-coefficient of variation; SE-standard
Table 3
Basic statistical parameters for the position of the condyle in right laterotrusion in the experimental (E) and control (C) group at baseline (0) and after eight weeks (8) of the treatment. X-mean value; SD-standard deviation, CV-coefficient of variation
Table 4
Basic statistical parameters for the position of the condyle in left laterotrusion in the experimental (E) and control (C) group at baseline (0) and after eight weeks (8) of the treatment. X-mean value; SD-standard deviation, CV-coefficient of variation
Table 5
Basic statistical parameters for the position of the condyle in centric relation in the experimental (E) and control (C) group at baseline (0) and after eight weeks (8) of the treatment. X-mean value; SD-standard deviation, CV-coefficient of variation
Table 6
Relative percentage of changes of condyle position in protrusion, right and left laterotrusion and central relation in the experimental and control group after eight weeks of treatment compared to the baseline and the results of 2 test.
Discussion
Despite generally accepted assumptions that the occlusal splint is the treatment of choice for bruxism, there is still a lack of quality evidence to explain its exact impact. The unclear mechanism and the effects of splints in bruxism treatment are not surprising, since the exact etiology of bruxism, i.e. the exact cause of the central nervous system activation during sleep, has not been clarified so far (7, 17). In this pilot study, the impact of the occlusal splint treatment on changes in mandibular border movements and those in condyle position in subjects with bruxism was examined during 8 weeks. Subsequently, this impact was compared with the control group, for which no similar studies were found in the reviewed literature. The measurements for all positions other than CR were performed without a splint, since measurements with splints inside the mouth do not always show correct results of mandibular movements and condyle position, as they depend on the thickness of the splint (changed vertical dimension) and its occlusal design (18). The only measurement with a splint in the mouth was performed for the CR position because the splint was initially fabricated in CR. The results of this study have shown that all measured mandibular movements and changes in the condyle position indicate an increase in values during treatment. There was no statistically significant difference established for any of the abovementioned parameters. The data obtained for border movements were expected because all subjects with TMD, myofascial pain, and muscle spasm (16) or with some other condition limiting mandibular movements were excluded from this study. As opposed to this, bruxism does not limit them. It only causes hypertrophy of the masticatory muscles (2, 17). Agerberg et al. (19) have suggested considering the value of 40 mm as normal for maximum unforced mouth opening and 5 mm for laterotrusions. In this study, before the beginning of the treatment, mandibular movements in subjects with bruxism averaged 43.69 mm for mouth opening, 8.28 mm for left laterotrusion, and 8.17 mm for right laterotrusion. The increase in all mandibular movements after splint treatment established in this study was confirmed in similar studies in asymptomatic subjects, as well as in subjects with bruxism (12) and TMD (20, 21). In this study, the highest increase in mandibular movements was found for mouth opening, which is consistent with the research by Serrano et al. (12) and Katyayana et al. (20). The initial values of condyle displacement at mouth opening approach the values in asymptomatic patients from previously published studies (22, 23) only after the occlusal splint treatment. Although they do not reach their values, splint treatment in subjects with bruxism results in increased mandibular and condylar movements. If this pilot study had been continued, it would have shown the effect of treatment duration on movements and their possible approaching to the values in asymptomatic subjects. No studies examining the differences in condyle displacement in subjects with bruxism at mouth opening after splint treatment were found in the available literature. In this study, the highest increase of 13.8% was established for the left condyle at mouth opening, whereas the increase for the right condyle amounted to 8.9%. Following similar studies (24-26), condyle displacements are, as expected, small and limited by joint space, disc-condyle relationship and disc adaptability. The ideal protrusion movement should be without the condyle displacement in the transversal plane, which has been rarely found in the research so far. Therefore Slavicek (27) described a displacement in the transversal plane (z) of 0.2-0.3 mm as expected. In this study, a transversal displacement (z) of 0.23 mm remained unchanged after the splint treatment in the experimental group, whereas a change of 0.07 mm was found in the control group, which indicates that the use of splints does not influence transversal condylar movements in protrusion. Unlike the transversal plane (z), the changes in the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) plane were found both in the experimental and control group. The greatest change of 18.5% was found in the x-axis of the experimental group, referring to a displacement in the forward direction. These results cannot be compared with research on protrusion displacement in asymptomatic or symptomatic subjects because they were either investigated without the splint treatment or by another test method, and the objective of research was mainly to investigate into the condylar path rather than spatial displacement with respect to the initial reference position, for which the values were higher than the results obtained in this study (28-30). Similar studies were not found in the reviewed literature. The condyle position during left and right laterotrusion changed both in the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) plane, reaching a larger distance from the MI in the experimental than in the control group. The values for the transversal (z) plane remained the same for the right laterotrusion and were increased for the left laterotrusion. Apart from changes in the occlusal tooth surfaces caused by splints affecting lateral movements (31) and increasing laterotrusion, the obtained results draw to the conclusion that the splint treatment affected condyle position displacement in both the experimental and control group in at least two planes. The initial difference, as well as the difference after the treatment in the condyle position between the reference position and the CR, was smaller than the value of mean deviation confirmed in previous studies (32). As expected, the changes in condyle position after the splint treatment were the smallest for both subject groups in the CR position. Although minimal, the established changes have confirmed the fact that the CR position is not a fixed, static position, but that the CR is a range of possible positions dependent on the symmetrical mandibular muscle activity with a minimum level of muscle tone (27). In the interpretation of the results of larger condylar displacement in the CR in the experimental group, a change in the occlusal surface of the splint, irrespective of its fabrication material, should also be considered due to wear caused by parafunctional movements (33). A study comparing the effect of occlusal splints on the condyle position in subjects with TMD and asymptomatic control group showed that splints influenced the condyle position to a greater extent in the experimental group than in the control group after 10 weeks (34, 35). This study also showed a greater impact of the occlusal splint treatment in 10 out of 14 measured parameters of the condylar position in subjects with bruxism than in the control group (Table 1). Two parameters of the control group showed a change of less than 1% at protrusion, which was also expected (26, 27). A statistically significant difference was found in 5 out of 14 compared condyle position parameters, 3 of which were in the vertical axis and 2 in the transversal axis. No statistically significant difference was found in the horizontal axis for all movements and positions. One limitation of this pilot study is a small number of subjects, which reduces the strength of our conclusions. However, this study is a part of a full scale study which is now in progress, thus providing us with more extensive information about the subject.
Conclusion
Although the current pilot study included a small number of subjects, it has proved that there is an impact of the occlusal splint treatment on mandibular border movements in subjects with bruxism and, also, an impact on a greater change in the condyle position in subjects with bruxism than in the control group. The obtained results are encouraging for further research, in a way to include a larger number of subjects in the experimental and control group and to prolong the duration of the occlusal splint treatment.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest in this study.
Article information
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Sep; 54(3): 322–332.
doi: 10.15644/asc54/3/10
PMCID: PMC7586893
PMID: 33132395
1Private practice; PhD student, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
2Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
3Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, University Dental Clinic
Corresponding author.
Address for correspondence: Josip Škaričić, Private practice in Split, Student of doctortal study at School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, moc.liamg@ciciraks.pisoj
Author's contribution
J.S. - principal author of the paper and research, gathered patients, conducted measurements, and wrote the entire article; S.C. – assisted in the use of measuring instruments and in making measurements on patients; S.K.S. – assisted in statistical data processing; M.V. - assisted in writing the article and assisted in collecting literature; N.D. – devised a research plan and assisted in implementation.
Received 2020 Apr 28; Accepted 2020 Aug 24.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
Articles from Acta Stomatologica Croatica are provided here courtesy of University of Zagreb: School of Dental Medicine
REFERENCES
1. International Classification of Sleep Disorders. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Sleep related bruxism. 3rd ed. Westchester, Darien, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014:303-311.
2. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. November;45(11):837–44. 10.1111/joor.12663 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Takahashi H, Masaki C, Makino M, Yoshida M, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, et al. Management of sleep-time masticatory muscle activity using stabilisation splints affects psychological stress. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:892–9. 10.1111/joor.12110 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Ilovar S, Zolger D, Castrillon E, Car J, Huckvale K. Biofeedback for treatment of awake and sleep bruxism in adults: systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2014. May 2;3:42. 10.1186/2046-4053-3-42 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Glass EG, Glaros AG, MacGlynn FD. Myofacial dysfunction: treatments used by ADA members. Cranio. 1993. January;11(1):25–9. 10.1080/08869634.1993.11677937 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Pierce CJ, Chrisman K, Bennett ME, Close JM. Stress, anticipatory stress, and psychologic measures related to sleep bruxism. J Orofac Pain. 1995. Winter;9(1):51–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ. Oral splints: the crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9(3):345–61. 10.1177/10454411980090030701 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Sójka A, Huber J, Kaczmarek E, Hędzelek W. Evaluation of Mandibular Movement Functions Using Instrumental Ultrasound System. J Prosthodont. 2017. February;26(2):123–8. 10.1111/jopr.12389 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Stiesch-Scholz M, Demling A, Rossbach A. Reproducibility of jaw movements in patients with craniomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. November;33(11):807–12. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01636.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10.Čimić S. Kliničko istraživanje kretnji položaja donje čeljusti ultrazvučnim postupkom [dissertation]. Zagreb: Stomatološki fakultet; 2014. [Google Scholar]
11.Čimić S, Kraljević Šimunković S, Badel T, Dulčić N, Alajbeg I, Ćatić A. Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: intraindividual variations. Cranio. 2014. April;32(2):104–9. 10.1179/0886963413Z.00000000015 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12.Serrano PO, Faot F, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Effect of dental wear, stabilization appliance and anterior tooth reconstruction on mandibular movements during speech. Braz Dent J. 2008;19(2):151–8. 10.1590/S0103-64402008000200012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13.Obrez A, Gallo LM. Anatomy and function of the TMJ. In: Laskin DM, Greene CS, Hylander WL, editors. TMDs: An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co, 2006;39–41. [Google Scholar]
14.Shetty S, Pitti V, Satish Babu CL, Surendra Kumar GP, Deepthi BC. Bruxism: a literature review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010. September;10(3):141–8. 10.1007/s13191-011-0041-5 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15.Pintado MR, Anderson GC, De Long R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:313–20. 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70189-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16.MeSH Browser [database on the Internet]. Čelić R, Dulčić N. Dijagnostički kriteriji za istraživanje temporomandibularnih poremećaja DKI/TMP. 2004. Available from: https://ubwp.buffalo.edu/rdc-tmdinternational/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2017/01/RDC-Croatian.pdf
17.Beddis H, Pemberton M, Davies S. Sleep bruxism: an overview for clinicians. Br Dent J. 2018;225(6):497–501. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.757 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18.Demling A, Fauska K, Ismail F, Stiesch M. A comparison of change in condylar position in asymptomatic volunteers utilizing a stabilization and a pivot appliance. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010. September;10(3):141–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Agerberg G. Maximal mandibular movements in young men and women. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974. March;67(2):81–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Katyayan PA, Katyayan MK, Shah RJ, Patel G. Efficacy of appliance therapy on temporomandibular disorder related facial pain and mandibular mobility: a randomized controlled study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(3):251–61. 10.1007/s13191-013-0320-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21.Ekberg E, Nilner M. Treatment outcome of appliance therapy in temporomandibular disorder patients with myofascial pain after 6 and 12 months. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004. December;62(6):343–9. 10.1080/00016350410010063 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22.Fukui T, Tsuruta M, Murata K, Wakimoto Y, Tokiwa H, Kuwahara Y. Correlation between facial morphology, mouth opening ability, and condylar movement during opening-closing jaw movements in female adults with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(4):327–36. 10.1093/ejo/24.4.327 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23.Travers KH, Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Associations between incisor and mandibular condylar movements during maximum mouth opening in humans. Arch Oral Biol. 2000. April;45(4):267–75. 10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00140-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24.Santosa RE, Aziz M, Whittle T, Wanigaratne K, Klineberg U. The influence of the leaf gauge and anterior jig on jaw muscle electromyography and condylar head displacement: a pilot study. Aust Dent J. 2006. March;51(1):33–41. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00398.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25.Linsen SS, Stark H, Klitzschmüller M. Reproducibility of condyle position and influence of splint therapy on different registration techniques in asymptomatic volunteers. Cranio. 2013. January;31(1):32–9. 10.1179/crn.2013.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26.Čimić S, Kraljević Šimunković S, Simonić Kocijan S, Matijević J, Dulčić N, Ćatić A. Articulator-related registration and analysis of sagittal condylar inclination. Acta Clin Croat. 2015;54(4):432–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Slavicek R. Clinical and instrumental functional analysis for diagnosis and treatment planning. Part 5. Axiography. J Clin Orthod. 1988;22(10):656–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Peck CC, Murray GM, Johnson CW, Klineberg IJ. Trajectories of condylar points during nonworking side and protrusive movements of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(3):322–31. 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70088-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29.Zimmer B, Jäger A, Kubein-Meesenburg D. Comparison of ‘normal’ TMJ-function in Class I, II, and III individuals. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13(1):27–34. 10.1093/ejo/13.1.27 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30.Landes CA, Sader R. Sonographic evaluation of the ranges of condylar translation and of temporomandibular joint space as well as first comparison with symptomatic joints. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35(8):374–81. 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.06.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31.Ogawa M, Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. Effect of altered canine guidance on condylar movement during laterotrusion. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(2):139–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Linsen SS, Stark H, Samai A. The influence of different registration techniques on condyle displacement and electromyographic activity in stomatognathically healthy subjects: a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(1):47–54. 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60017-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33.Reyes-Sevilla M, Kuijs RH, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ, Lobbezoo F. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. July;45(7):539–44. 10.1111/joor.12636 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34.Ekberg EC, Sabet ME, Petersson A, Nilner M. Occlusal appliance therapy in a short-term perspective in patients with temporomandibular disorders correlated to condyle position. Int J Prosthodont. 1998. May-June;11(3):263–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Limchaichana N, Nilsson H, Petersson A, Ekberg E. Resilient appliance-therapy treatment outcome in patients with TMD pain correlated to MRI-determined changes in condyle position. Cranio. 2009. July;27(3):185–93. 10.1179/crn.2009.028 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
CITATION
留言