contrasted with occlusal splint: a pilot study
WeiPing Gu, Jie Yang, [...], and Chen Wang
Reference
(Ref ID): PMC4389117
Chosen Image filename: PMC4389117_Figure_02.jpg
Document structure and format:
Title: Summary of Research Paper on "Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy via a Mini Wireless Device on Sleep Bruxism Contrasted with Occlusal Splint: A Pilot Study"
I. Introduction
This research paper explores the efficacy of biofeedback therapy using a mini wireless device for managing sleep bruxism compared to traditional occlusal splint therapy. Sleep bruxism, characterized by tooth grinding and clenching during sleep, can have negative impacts on oral health. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy and its potential as a convenient measure for mild bruxers.
II. Methodology
The study employed a pilot research design. A total of 24 volunteers with sleep bruxism were divided into two groups: the biofeedback therapy (GTB) group and the occlusal splint (GTO) group. The biofeedback therapy group used a mini pressure sensor integrated with a monitoring circuit in a maxillary biofeedback splint. Bruxism events were detected by the device, and vibrations alerted the participants when the threshold was exceeded. The frequency and duration of bruxism events were recorded using a monitoring program. Data were collected and analyzed after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment.
III. Results
The analysis of the results showed that after 6 and 12 weeks, the biofeedback therapy group experienced a significant decline in the number and duration of bruxism events. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the occlusal splint group after treatment. Statistical analyses indicated significant differences between the two groups after the same treatment period. These results suggest that biofeedback therapy may be an effective and convenient alternative to occlusal splint therapy for mild bruxers.
IV. Discussion
The findings of this study indicate that biofeedback therapy using a mini wireless device shows promise in managing sleep bruxism. The monitoring device successfully detected bruxism events and provided alerts to the participants, leading to a reduction in the frequency and duration of bruxism behavior. This non-intrusive approach has advantages over traditional occlusal splint therapy in terms of comfort and effectiveness.
The implications of these findings are significant for the management of sleep bruxism. Biofeedback therapy could be an alternative option for mild bruxers, potentially reducing the negative impacts on oral health. However, further research is needed to validate these results and address any limitations in the study, such as the small sample size and short follow-up period.
V. Conclusion
In conclusion, this pilot study highlights the potential efficacy of biofeedback therapy via a mini wireless device in managing sleep bruxism. The results suggest that biofeedback therapy may be an effective and convenient measure for mild bruxers. This research contributes to the field by providing an alternative approach to traditional occlusal splint therapy. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore the long-term effects of biofeedback therapy on sleep bruxism.
Comments